Initial Project Pitch

For our ‘Simulated Selves’ project we initially planned to create two sculptural busts with projection-mapped Artificial Intelligence (AI) avatars based on our scanned likeness and data (personality profile, speech style, mannerisms and philosophical perspectives).  These busts would be situated in close proximity to each other so that the simulations could engage in ongoing call-and-response conversation about the nature of self, being and existence.

In particular, we wanted the AI entities to reflect on the differences between human and machine intelligence and whether it is possible to create an AI archive of the self that can act as a substitute worker and virtual family/community member in the absence of the ‘real’ person.  We also planned to address a range of current issues (e.g. data archive bias), but in a way that avoids definitive positions in favour of more playful speculations that encompass a range of perspectives. We felt that this approach would be more effective to encourage viewers to consider the possible implications of AI in light of their own views. To further participant engagement, we were also excited about the possibility of allowing audiences to engage in conversation around AI, by speaking into the ear(s) of the figures.

To signal that viewers needed to talk into the ears of the figures, we considered using a visual sign such as a large hearing ‘earhorn’. Although we later settled on a telephone and modem to make links to telecommunications networks and early Internet experiences.

Mock-up image of 'Bill' with simulated self projection.

Mock-ups of the initial busts with projection-mapped AI avatars.

Mock-up of telephone/modem interface to enable conversation with the ‘Simulated Selves’.


Explore further iterations: